Pride and Prejudice movie characters, part 13

Charles Bingley
Bingley is probably the easiest part to play of the Pride and Prejudice characters. He is friendly, kind, and defers to Darcy in matters of importance out of regard for Darcy being a person whose family has always had money and property. There is also the fact that his friend exhibits greater self-control in his emotions, which to Bingley is an indication of dependability and trust.

Here's Bingley as I see it:

1940 - Bruce Lester is my least favorite Bingley, not because he does a poor job with the part he's given, but there is just not that deference to Darcy which is necessary for the story. The idea that the relationship between Darcy and Charles could have the weight of persuading a man in love to leave the object of his love is just not plausible as portrayed in this version. And another thing, he is not very handsome, which Charles is supposed to be.

1980 - Osmund Bullock is better looking than Bruce Lester, so his is better suited to the part from that point of view. But here again we find a failure in displaying that most important aspect of the relationship between himself and Darcy -- that of dependence upon his good friend for making important decisions. So even though it is enjoyable to see some scenes from the book involving Bingley that are not shown in the other movies, this Mr. Bingley falls short of fitting the bill as far as the book goes.

Bride and Prejudice - Naveen Andrews is perhaps one of the best-looking men in the world, but alas, this version also falls short in the same way as the two mentioned above. This version, of course, gives him the name Balraj.

2005 - Simon Woods portrays a different Charles Bingley by being a bit of a bumbler, and in so doing has that quality of natural dependence on his friend. We see him leaning on Darcy for various reasons. I really like this Bingley even though there is much about him that is not quite as described by Austen, such as the time when he is talking to Jane about reading books, which is one of my favorite scenes. He is also handsome, and therefore is my pick as runner-up for the best Charles Bingley.

1995 - Crispin Bonham-Carter is without question the best Bingley. He is good-looking, and he manages that innocent appearance of one less experienced that Fitzwilliam Darcy of Pemberley. His relationship with his sisters is great as well. You can really see in his depiction of Charles Bingley the perfect match for Miss Jane Bennet.

2005 Simon Woods

2005 Jane and Charles

1995 Crispin Bonham-Carter

1995 Bingley and Jane

     

Pride and Prejudice movie characters, part 12

Miss Jane Bennet

Jane is described as the most beautiful of the Bennet girls and, in fact, of all Meryton. As to her character, the following excerpts give us a good idea of what Jane should be like in a movie:

(Chapter 17)

“ELIZABETH related to Jane the next day, what had passed between Mr. Wickham and herself. Jane listened with astonishment and concern; she knew not how to believe that Mr. Darcy could be so unworthy of Mr. Bingley's regard; and yet, it was not in her nature to question the veracity of a young man of such amiable appearance as Wickham. The possibility of his having really endured such unkindness was enough to interest all her tender feelings; and nothing therefore remained to be done, but to think well of them both, to defend the conduct of each, and throw into the account of accident or mistake, whatever could not be otherwise explained.”
"They have both,'' said she, "been deceived, I dare say, in some way or other, of which we can form no idea. Interested people have perhaps misrepresented each to the other. It is, in short, impossible for us to conjecture the causes or circumstances which may have alienated them, without actual blame on either side.''

“Very true, indeed; and now, my dear Jane, what have you got to say in behalf of the interested people who have probably been concerned in the business? Do clear them too, or we shall be obliged to think ill of somebody.''

In Darcy’s letter to Elizabeth, he says of Jane:

“Her look and manners were open, cheerful, and engaging as ever, but without any symptom of peculiar regard, and I remained convinced from the evening’s scrutiny, that though she received his attentions with pleasure, she did not invite them by any participation of sentiment. ... the serenity of your sister’s countenance and air was such as might have given the most acute observer a conviction that, however amiable her temper, her heart was not likely to be easily touched.”

With that, judging the portrayals of Jane in all the movies we’ve been discussing from this standpoint, here’s how I see it:

1940 - Maureen O'Sullivan is surely pretty enough to be Jane Bennet, but the movie is not long enough to develop the character and therefore those qualities of overriding concern for others and eagerness to think the best of everyone are never shown by her.

1980 - Sabina Franklyn is not as pretty as Elizabeth Garvie, who plays Lizzy in this version, so she begins badly on that first impression! And then we don’t see the angelic Jane that her sister praises so much.

2004 Bride and Prejudice - Namrata Shirodkar is lovely enough, but here again the movie does not give time for the Jane of the book to come out.

2005 - Rosamund Pike most fits what I would think of in the beauty department - her face can easily take on the serenity that is striking (and having Keira Knightley as Lizzy is perfect because Kiera is so unattractive by comparison). However, this movie is so badly done in so many ways, and once more that wonderful dynamic of Jane’s qualities being a counterbalance to Lizzy’s is lost.    

1995 - Susannah Harker is not really pretty enough to play the part as far as I’m concerned, but she definitely is given enough screen time to capture Jane Bennet, which she does better than all the other girls listed here that have played her. My vote for best Jane Bennet goes to her.

Rosamund Pike

Prettiest Jane Bennet

Susannah Harker

Best Jane Bennet

Pride and Prejudice movie characters, part 11

Mr. Wickham

Mr. Wickham is described by Jane Austen this way: “His appearance was greatly in his favour; he had all the best part of beauty, a fine countenance, a good figure, and very pleasing address.” and “when Mr. Wickham walked into the room, Elizabeth felt that she had neither been seeing him before, nor thinking of him since, with the smallest degree of unreasonable admiration. The officers of the  ̶ shire were in general a very creditable, genetlemanlike set, and the best of them were of the present party; but Mr. Wickham was as far beyond them all in person, countenance, air, and walk, as they were superior to the broadfaced, stuffy uncle Philips.”

Going by this description, Wickham should be a very handsome man, actually striking in appearance, someone who speaks in such a pleasing manner that a person would naturally trust him from the beginning of their acquaintance. Based on these observations, I have rated the portrayal of five of the actors that have played him accordingly:

1980 - Peter Settelen — He looks so deceptive and untrustworthy in his portrayal of Wickham, it comes across like a joke.  This makes it impossible to believe that this is the guy that sharp Lizzy Bennet is suppose to be taken in by. Everytime I see this version, I keep expecting Wickham to look at the camera with a wink as if to say “I don’t believe what I’m saying and I know you watching don’t believe what I’m saying either” like they do in those silly satires that blatantly exaggerate the characters well-known personality. And there’s also the fact that Peter Settelen is not the striking man that Wickham is suppose to be. For these reasons, it is my opinion this is the worst portrayal of Wickham.

Bride and Prejudice - Daniel Gillies — If Daniel Gillies wasn’t as handsome as he is, he and Peter Settelen would have been tied as the worst. The problem I have with him is, like Peter, he doesn’t look or act trustworthy in the least. Wickham is suppose to be a charmer, but instead Daniel comes across more like a harmer (pardon my use of rhyme here). Having his first appearance be coming out of the water on the beach could be some poke at the 1995 BBC A&E version, I don’t know, but in that scene he walks and looks like a wet monkey rather than the man described as being ‘far beyond other men in countenance and walk.’ So my own opinion is, he makes the next worst Wickham.

2005 - Rupert Friend — Definitely has the looks, and based on his performances in other movies, he would have been a great Mr. Wickham had he been given the chance. In the scene where he informs Lizzy about his past with Darcy, he comes across like a pouty brat, definitely not someone strong-willed who Elizabeth would be attracted to. Throw in the scene at the shop with the Bennet girls looking for ribbons and that is all we see of him. It is a real shame that so little is done with his character in this version, and for that reason, I can’t see how he would be anyone’s best Wickham, though he very easily could have been.

1995 - Adrian Lukis — Handles the pleasing address well, although, he is so not attractive - I would say at best he could be described as plain  ̶  he doesn’t even come close to fitting the description of Wickham. I wonder if the producers didn’t want Colin Firth to have his rival be a rival in appearance. Whatever the case, in choosing him for Wickham, the producers of this version ignored a dynamic of the book that would have made this one so much better. Not the best Wickham.

1940 - Edward Ashley — This older version has so many good things about it. As Mr. Wickham, Ashley Is dashingly handsome and very charming in his address. Without question, he plays the best Wickham. It is clear that the producers, and/or Laurence Olivier had no qualms about using someone that could compete for best-looking man on set.  Yes, he is older than the real Wickham is suppose to be, as is the rest of this cast, but that’s the way it was for movies back then, unless your name was Shirley Temple. All in all, Edward Ashley is the embodiment of Wickham as described in Pride and Prejudice in any of the variations so far.

Benefits of Reading

I enjoyed this Reader's Digest article . . .
The full title is Benefits of reading: Getting Smart, Thin, Healthy, Happy

Ten benefits given:
1. Gives muscle to your memory.
2. Gives your workout more staying power.
3. Keeps your brain young.
4. Can melt away stress.
5. Boosts your vocabulary.
6. Improves empathy.
7. Can encourage life goals.
8. Helps you feel more connected.
9. Can brighten your day.
10. Can help you save cash.
Read the full article to get the thoughts behind these tips
on how your brain and body benefit by reading.

Of course, you need to be reading good stuff, or you're better off not reading at all. "Bad associations spoil useful habits" says the best book, and when you're reading, you really are associating with the characters (or subject) of the book.

Enjoy what you're reading!

Thank you for reading what noeandcindy.write !

Where have you been?

You may have been wondering ...

Well, if you have been, let me tell you!

We got our book, "Mr Darcy falls in love" in paperback now, as you know, and have been out and about with it. I also checked around just for the fun of it, and found out you can get it at almost any online bookstore you want! (And at various prices too, I might add) There's also a Goodreads giveaway of our book going on till end of Sept, you better get in on that soon! (Scroll down a bit on that page, you'll see the "Enter to Win" button, only for US right now)

Noe has been making various Pride & Prejudice woodart items, you should go take a look at those on his wood blog. Of course, that blog is also needing attention, but soon (I promise) I'll get it ready for people to purchase from ... you can already email him if you want to place an order for a personalized, unique, elegant, extra-special handcrafted piece you just can't do without! ♥

AND Noe already finished the manuscript for his next novel, which I'm currently editing. Of course, this is the first draft, mind you, and you never know if the author will want to go back and make changes, so not sure how long it will take, but we hope that won't take too long either.

We have other stuff in store for the future, so keep coming back...

Thank you for reading what noeandcindy.write !

https://www.amazon.com/author/noeandcindy.write

My InstaGram

Find us on InstaGram


I know, we're slow to get on to the social sites.... we're on Google+ 
And now on InstaGram. Check us out: noes_expressions

You'll also be able to see some of the woodart we do there.
Just starting to do our earrings and other things again.
There's a blog for those too, getting it up little by little as well.
But you can view some of the things we've done in the past:
noeswoodexpressions.blogspot.com

Thanks, look forward to "following" you there on InstaGram.

Pride and Prejudice movie characters, part 10

Lydia Bennet

I’m just going to dive into this character, as we have already mentioned that we’re reviewing the characters in the movie versions of Pride & Prejudice.

Lydia is pivotal to the movement of the plot, since it is her indiscretion with Wickham that gives us a deeper view of Darcy. Elizabeth had seen a change in him when she was traveling with her aunt and uncle, however it is one thing to be more open and sociable, but quite another to put yourself out as she learns Darcy has done to make things right for Lydia. Knowing he had to deal with Wickham through it all, nothing could have given Elizabeth a clearer view of how real and substantial his character makeover was.

In Lydia, we see someone who is not just a naive youngster. We are told that she steadfastly refused to leave Wickham even though they were not married, so her character is actually a mixture of youthful exuberance combined with loose morals. Lydia sought only one thing - to be with a man, and if that would be a husband, well and good. But if not, well, we know how she felt about that.

Hence when considering the portrayals of her on screen, there must be at least a hint of her lack of steady character, or to say it more plainly, lack of morals. Most of the versions don’t spend near enough time developing the Lydia character despite the importance of the part.

So, here's our review of Lydia in the movie versions we like:
1940 - Ann Rutherford is delightful in this version. But because the pace of the movie centers its main focus on Darcy and Elizabeth, there's no room to develop the character of Lydia, other than to let us know this is the girl Wickham runs off with and ends up marrying.

1980 - Natalie Ogle. Despite the length of it, this version gives Lydia very little screen time, and Natalie suffers from the same predicament as the 1940 movie.

2005 - Jena Malone is sweet and lovely, but not even close to being a good Lydia Bennet.

2004 Bride and Prejudice - Peeya Rai Chowdhary as Lakhi Bakshi actually gives our favorite a real run for her money. But because this story changes what becomes of her running off with Wickham, the result is that her character is deflated. She is turned into simply a willful, naive youth who is rescued from the clutches of the evil Wickham. Until then, she had the part down solid.

Our favorite Lydia award goes to:
1995 - Julia Sawalha... Without question, she brings all the elements of Lydia Bennet to perfection. Even though she was much older than Lydia is said to be when she played this part, she captures that sense of youthful zest for life that is found in an unbridled teenager. She displays a headstrong, independent girl that can easily be thought of as running off with George Wickham and being determined to stay with him.

1940

1980

2005

Lakhi Bakshi

1995

"Mr Darcy falls in love" now in print

We've been working on this print copy for a little while 
and are happy to announce it's now available!

  

We'll post about the self-publishing process on CreateSpace one of these days, I just had to get this on here today.
Click here to: *Buy the book on CreateSpace* 

Our 12 foot -- no, make that 12 inch -- Mr Darcy!

Mr Darcy falls in love statuette

You know my Noe is a real artist... I've told you that before :-)
He has had this piece done for awhile, but we were waiting to unveil it when we got our Mr Darcy falls in love book out in print. I can't wait any longer, even though the print version will be out very soon, believe me!

The statuette is made using the same picture Noe did for the cover of our book, including the original font. We later changed some of the cover font, but this is still the one for the digital copy, at least for now. One of the nice aspects of the piece is that he's "reversible." That way, he can be displayed on a table and be seen from both sides. 

I had lots of fun playing with the pictures I took, some with my Samsung phone camera, the others with my camera I've had a few years. AND I'm not a photographer -- obviously! But you can see how cool it is.

 
  

We are considering the idea of having a giveaway with our Mr Darcy statuette, or we may use him in another fashion. If you would like to have some of your artwork made into a statuette, send me an email (find the address on our NoeCindy page).

Thank you for reading what noeandcindy.write !

https://www.amazon.com/author/noeandcindy.write

Get your free Amazon Kindle apps 

Pride and Prejudice movie characters, part 9

CHARLOTTE LUCAS

In the adaptations of these movies that we've been discussing, we have a wonderful array of actors. In the book, Charlotte is described as Elizabeth’s intimate friend and is said to be sensible and intelligent. Being twenty-seven, she is in danger of becoming an old maid -- some would say she already qualified for the monicker. At that time, this was a heavy burden for a woman from a relatively poor family. We might remember what Emma Woodhouse says on the subject to her new young friend, "Never mind, Harriet, I shall not be a poor old maid; and it is poverty only which makes celibacy contemptible to a generous public! A single woman, with a very narrow income, must be a ridiculous, disagreeable old maid! -- the proper sport of boys and girls -- but a single woman, of good fortune, is always respectable, and may be as sensible and pleasant as anybody else.”

Charlotte is, by all accounts, plain. The book says this after her being engaged to Mr. Collins: "Without thinking highly either of men or of matrimony, marriage had always been her object; it was the only honourable provision for well-educated young women of small fortune, and however uncertain of giving happiness, must be their pleasantest preservative from want. This preservative she had now obtained; and at the age of twenty-seven, without having ever been handsome, she felt all the good luck of it."

She is a most likable character, and everyone that has taken up the role has had the advantage of playing someone most people already have a fondness for. I suppose anyone Lizzy likes is in a fair way of being liked by the audience. Because I like all these Charlottes, I will not attempt to pick a favorite, but rather offer some comments about each one.

1940

1940 - Karen Morley You have to love this girl as Charlotte Lucas. When Mrs. Bennet and Mrs. Lucas are talking about Bingley as they and their daughters are shopping for material for dresses for the upcoming assembly ball and someone says Bingley may fall in love with Charlotte, she returns with this comment: “Not if he sees Jane or Lizzy first.” I know that line isn’t in the book, but most of what is in this movie isn’t, such as one evening at Rosings when she takes the wine glass away from her husband. That is one of those funny moments that add so much to his character and show Charlotte as a great wife. But as I have said a number times on the blog, this is my favorite P&P and Karen Morley is wonderful.

1980

1980 - Irene Richard If the rest of the cast was as capable as Irene,  this would easily be my favorite P&P. It has more scenes from the book than any other, and it has those scenes that make you love the story. One that comes to mind is when all the girls are talking about the Meryton ball and Charlotte comes to Darcy’s defense by saying that ‘with everything Darcy has going for him he has a reason to be proud,’ which leads Lizzy to say one of the great lines of the book: “I could easily forgive his pride had he not mortified mine.”

1995

1995 - Lucy Scott You might notice she smiles very little, and her approach to this part is undoubtedly one of the main reason she works so well in it. This obviously helps her to achieve that look of an intelligent person who would rationally determine to have Mr. Collins after Lizzy’s refusal rather than hope for love to come her way. As she says, “I am not romantic, you know; I never was.” Well, Lucy Scott plays her role perfectly.

2004 - Sonali Kulkarni as Chandra Lamba (B&P equivalent to Charlotte Lucas) Sonali is without doubt the prettiest girl to do this part. That being the case, one might be tempted to find fault with it, but her conversations with Lalita show just how close the two friends were. The song they sing when going into town with a mutual friend who is getting married is one of the highlights of this version. Also, the conversation she has with Lalita after she marries Mr. Kohli is lovely. She tells her, “I know he wasn’t right for you, but I love it here (meaning California), and he adores me.” Spoken with that fabulous accent, it is a terrific scene. And then to have Lalita say, “Perhaps I was too quick to judge him.” ...what a perfect way to end that scene between these two longtime friends. It’s ridiculous, though, that you can’t find a good picture of her from this movie anywhere.

 

2005 - Claudie Blakley Of all the Charlottes, Claudie most fits the description of ‘never having been handsome’ as they do a good job of making her look very plain. There is so much about this version that I don’t like, and one of those scenes is when Charlotte talks to Lizzy about marrying Mr. Collins and says in a rather angry tone, “Don’t you judge me, Lizzy!” Other than that, she is not too bad as Charlotte.